![]() ![]() Then again, they were only 12, so what could we expect? Lastly, those special effects were not so on point.ħ. But it meant leaving out some of the ah-mazing deets from the book! While Daniel, Rupert, and Emma were perfect for their roles and we'd never replace them, you have to admit that their acting wasn't exactly Oscar-worthy back in 2001. ![]() They basically had to introduce the most complex, crazy magical world, and all its amazing, cooky, and scary characters, into just two hours, which, to be fair, totes isn't an easy thing to do. While Sorcerer's Stone gets nostalgia points for being the first time we got to see the wizarding world of Hogwarts come to life, looking back, the movie had some serious flaws-the biggest being that it just felt rushed. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001) ![]() ![]() So if we were forced to choose favorites, here's our definitive ranking of the Harry Potter movies, from (least) best to binge-watch-for-days best!Ĩ. But there are 8 movies in the series and, and let's face it, some of them are better than others. There's no arguing that the Harry Potter films will go down in history as one of the most amazing YA-book-turned-movie series of all time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |